You are hereForums / By Discipline / Mountain (off road) / MTB Gear / Tubeless?? - Stan's No Tubes

Tubeless?? - Stan's No Tubes


jpack's picture

By jpack - Posted on 30 September 2008

NB: Originally posted elsewhere on the Global Riders Network and appears via syndication.

Has anybody tried Stan's No Tubes? Are they good? does it save weight?
What are the advantages/disadvantages?
any advice please

Tags
Rob's picture

Same as any tubeless kit... means you can run less pressure with less (no?) pinch flats. The gunk in the tire helps seal up smaller leaks (punctures) too.

I can't comment on the actual stans kit, but the No Tubes sealant seems good stuff. Although other people have tried Slime (or whatever it's called - green stuff from car stores) or even a mixture of the two.

Since going tubeless I've had zero flats on the trail. Now I'm doomed to one, but you get the idea - it's the way to go.

Search the forum, you'll find loads of conversations about this.

Carlgroover's picture

I recently saw it for $160 and thought this system looks good for a lot less money. http://farkin.net/forums/showthread.php?t=128521... I've just used molding latex in a non tubeless crossmark tyre on a tubeless rim and it works great, so now I'm thinking of doing the above system to my other wheels.
John

Rob's picture

DT Swiss also make a tubeless conversion kit - $55 per rim from CRC. Jenson have the Stans kit for $65US, 10US less at Price Point.

Most people will say you can just get a valve, some 3M tape (or strong electricians tape) and DIY. Wrap the tape firmly around your rim to make an air-tight seal, cut with a sharp knife and stuff the valve through where it belongs, put some Stans gunk in a UST tire and pop it on. Job done Smiling

Flynny's picture

I've just kitted out my DH bike with No tubes.

Dropped a heap of weight as I was running the DH tubes. Easy enough to fit, didn't even need to use a compressor to seal them (jagged it with the floor pump)

jpack's picture

Hey Flynny,
did you use the Stan's No Tubes kit? Do you need special tyres? or can i use my current Maxxis highroller and Kenda Nevegal?
cheers

Nick R's picture

Bought from JensonUSA for US$60 (plus shipping). Works well with all Tubeless UST tyres but its a bit of trial and error with standard tyres depending on the quality of the tyre bead and sidewall. I have been able to mount Schwalbe and Specialized standard tyres on DT Swiss rims with a floor pump and Stans kit relatively easily and never had a pinch flat.

There is a weight saving with standard tyres as the rim strips weigh about 50 grams and the sealant about 60 grams per wheel which is less than a standard tube which runs at around 200 grams. If you use UST tyres the weight saving isnt as great or it could be heavier but you may be able to get away without using sealant.

barney's picture

I switched to tubeless about 18 months ago and wouldn't go back to inner tubes. I initially used the stans kit and it worked fairly well but found sometimes the tyres would burp on technical terrain. Since then have installed a Bontrager rim liner and this is much better. Be aware that every 3-4 months you'll need to top up the stans liquid in your tyres. This only takes a few minutes but needs to be done. The one thing I've noticed is punctures are not a concern any longer. I recommend using UST tyres as they have a a thicker side wall.

nh's picture

I just installed a Stan's kit two weeks ago. They hold air fine and it is great running lower pressures and not getting flats.

I used UST tyres on the recommendation of lots of people. By the time you install the rim strips, liquid and have heavier tyres I don't think that you save much weight. Check out the website to find out more about them http://www.notubes.com/ .

CB's picture

I'm running a UST Nevegal / SB 8 combination on Crossmax ST rims. I previously had UST Ignitors on XM 819 rims. I usually run some Stans sealant in there too. Never had a problem inflating ( with a track pump) and never had a flat. ( In a previous life I was well known for pinch flatting). The Mavic valves are two piece and come with a little tool to remove the valve core ( do this very carefully !) this means that you can top up the sealant with a small syringe.... no mess whatsoever.

The only downside is that the UST versions of most tyres are fairly heavy, even allowing for the lack of a tube. The UST small block eight is around 300 - 350 grams heavier than the standard DTC version ( for a 2.1). And the Nevegal is around 200 - 250g heavier. They are both great and roll reallly well but I keep wondering what would happen if I just ran the non UST versions with more sealant. Sometimes I think it would just be adding risk ( thinner sidewalls etc.) but then I think that it could save around half a kilo of rotating weight ! ( or should I change to a UST Nobby Nic / Racing Ralph combo which could have a similar effect)

Has anyone tried non UST tyres on UST rims with sealant ? I'd love to know if it works ?

CB

jpack's picture

can you install a tubeless system when you have a schrader valve hole in the rim? its an oldish Mavic D321 rim.
Isn't the whole point of Stan's kit that you can use any rims and tyres - not only UST tyres?
Stan's promote weight loss in the wheels of 100 - 400g.
The aim for me of getting tubeless is to loose weight on the wheels.
I'm not concerned about flats. I've had my Kona for 14 months and never had a flat.

Flynny's picture

Yeah, Stans No tubes DH kit (comes with a wider rim strip)

Standard Minion tyres. You get them to seal using soapy water and then the goop will seal up any leakage more permanently. Too easy

Funkychicken's picture

I've used Stan's and its very good, but have switched back to tubes.

To understand the pros/cons you'll need to understand a few things about the system:
1. Essentially you install a rubber rim lining, and seal the air gaps between the tyre and the rim (lining) using sealant.
2. The sealant is poured on the inside of the tyre, the tyre is inflated using large volume of air, and the sealant then does its job of filling the cracks. The sealant dries quickly so as to maintain the seal before the air runs out.
3. The key ingredient is *air pressure*. The sealant only fills the gaps, but cannot maintain a seal unless there is sufficient pressure to keep the tyre bead firmly fitted to the rubber rim lining.
4. PUNCTURE flats seal quickly because you carry excess sealant in the tyre that fill the gaps. Air pressure helps a lot in this as the escaping air pushes the liquid sealant directly into the gap.
5. The sealant does not dry quickly or firmly enough to seal LARGE holes e.g. slashed tyres, although this situation is unlikely on Aussie trails.
6. However, the system is prone to failure if there is insufficient liquid sealant or air pressure in the tyre. Running lower than 20psi can cause the tyre bead to "fold" at the seal with the rim lining, and there's no inflating that tyre without a spare tube or high volume pump.
7. Sealant *will* dry out and require replacing, on an average of every 3 months. There doesn't seem to be a way of injecting sealant without having to deflate the tyre completely, even by pouring it through the valve stem.

The system *does* work fantastically and it was a joy to run low pressures and not worry about pinch flats. But personally i like "no maintenance" systems and didn't like having to re-install the system every 3 months. I also didnt like spending $$ on extra sealant every 3-6 months either.

Note: i'm not sure about other systems though, this was just the Stan's I used.

Flynny's picture

"5. The sealant does not dry quickly or firmly enough to seal LARGE holes e.g. slashed tyres, although this situation is unlikely on Aussie trails.
6. However, the system is prone to failure if there is insufficient liquid sealant or air pressure in the tyre. Running lower than 20psi can cause the tyre bead to "fold" at the seal with the rim lining, and there's no inflating that tyre without a spare tube or high volume pump."

You should carry a spare tube reguardless but.

I'm runnning 15psi int eh Dh tyres at the moment with no dramas. I plan to add slime to the tyres as an extra sealant. Should stay fresh for 2years and be cabable of sealing bigger holes

Whisperer's picture

Tubeless long term report.. Wouldn't go back.

I started with Crossmax UST wheels and UST (Panaracer Fire-XC) tyres.
Worked OK, but heavy. Added Stans liquid and no punctures, just used to see where puncture would have been by pinhead wet spots now and again.

From here on, I have never used a tubeless tyres again, but careful not to use tyres on the 'not recommended list' on stans website. My main reason for going back to std tyres is weight.
Whatever the marketing hye about better rolling, 100-250g is a LOT more rotating weight to accelerate and maintain speed on. IMHO, the rolling resistance of lighter tyres is better than the rolling resistance of heavier tyres - make sense huh!

Then moved to Mavic 717 (I think, probably got the numbers wrong, lightweight XC rim)
Used Stans rim strips, with sealant and standard tyres for less weight.
Worked ok, but a real hassle to change tyres as the strip needed thorough cleaning every time, and stuck to the tyre, so came away from the rim when changing.

Then went to Stans Olympic rims, with stans rim strips.
Worked very well, strip still a hassle, but sometimes needed (the strips) to get tyres to seal.
I used to use a floor pump, but bought a $99 compressor from bunnings Smiling

Then, decided to ditch the strips and use Stans 'Yellow tape' - 5g rather than 50g!
Have done this on the olympic rims, and a set of Stans 355 arch rims too.
Works well for most tyres, some are a bit of a hassle to air up at first, but once done work ok. (see tryre prep hint below)
I've also got a set of Stans Freeride rims (28mm wide) and using the rim strips on them, as I like to run them at around 28psi.

A few comments:
- Never had a 'puncture' in 4 years, but have had 2 sidewall slashes that couldn't be sealed so had to fit a tube trailside.
- Some tyres are porous and take a few days to seal properly (crossmark exception, nevegal, small block8 )
- I often fit a tyre onto an old rim with a tube for a few days at 60psi to flatten the moulding bumps before fitting tyres I have know to be 'loose' and hard to seal.
- The ultra low pressure thing is hype, 28 is as low as I need to go on NSW trails
Usually run 32 f 34 r for 78Kg rider. Any lower and you risk dinging your rims & 'burping'
- Not every non-ust tyre will air up, some specialised are a bit loose (adrenalin, enduro)
- I broke the bead on a kevlar high roller trying to seat the bead at 50psi
- I always go by Stans recommendations of 40psi max,
- For something really out there - I once ran Michelin slicks on my crossmax rims at 80psi for a few months, but the pressure was too high for stans to seal holes, it would push through, and slowly go down.
- And, yes you do need to replace the fluid after 3 months in summer, and top up in winter.

My front race wheel is a 330g olympic rim with 480g crossmark exception, 5g of tape and 60g of sealant! Rear wheel is the same with 452g rim.

I'm kind of lucky to be able to build my own wheels, and experiment. Currently running 3 sets of Stans rims on Hope Pro II hubs, as race, trail and big hit, and the old crossmax's as road wheels on my singlespeed.

It's a fun thing to do, you will be frustrated with some tyres, and it's a bit of a knack to mount 'loose' tyres, but once you get used to lighter weight and no punctures you'll be converted!

W.

hawkeye's picture

I was looking at a set on fleaBay recently. Or is it a non-issue?

Rob's picture

I have used tubeless on 3 different rims - 2 of these are specific UST and the other is converted with a kit.

Have to say it's much easier to get a seal on the UST specific ones, but once sealed there is no difference (well - regarding the tire staying there that is).

rangie's picture

tubeless rims make it easier and one less thing to worry about, need to apply.

as others ahev said ghetto sysyems with velo tape/electrical tape etc work but are just another thing you need to take into account with maintenance/weight etc.

at the end of the day, is the mucking around worth it to you, your time, etc

as I always say ANYTHING is possible, it just takes a tad longer Smiling

--
hanging out for a ride, throw me a bone, someone?

forsale! trek carbon top fuel, spare frame/fork combo

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Best Mountain Bike